Rollout telemetry audit
Trace staged rollout, canary, and percentage exposure so progressive delivery reports match what users actually saw.
App Dev Sync
Release decisions grounded in what your apps actually emit. Independent reviews of readiness gates, rollout telemetry, and post-release impact — delivered as briefs your release owners can share.
Request a release reviewPrimary engagement
Release readiness review
We inventory the telemetry that should answer go / hold / rollback, map gaps against your next window, and hand back a keep / fix / drop list with gate definitions both product and ops can recite.
Release readiness review
Confirm the events, gates, and freeze signals your team will trust before a coordinated release window.
See scopeRelated work
Other ways to engage
Start where the freeze call is sharpest — a contested canary, a muddy close-out, or a cadence that renames itself every train.
Post-release impact brief
Lock definitions for stability, adoption, and rollback triggers, then deliver a plain-language impact brief after the window closes.
Cadence & freeze workshop
Design naming, ownership, and change rules for release analytics so the next three trains do not fork your reports.
From recent clients
What teams said after the brief
App Dev Sync forced our release owners to write gate definitions before looking at charts. The readiness brief stopped three conflicting freeze calls in the same week.
The rollout audit showed our canary exposure was firing on deploy, not on UI. Mild caveat: you need an engineer who owns the flag SDK to land the fixes after they leave.
Post-release brief was the first close-out document product and ops both signed without rewriting. Dense, but the rollback check alone was worth the engagement.
How we work
A process sized for release owners and engineering together
Every engagement follows the same arc: lock the gate questions, inspect the stream, write shared definitions, deliver a brief. See the full sequence on our process page.